--- title: "Self-Hosted Alternative to Cursor Agents | Coder Agents" description: "Coder Agents is the fully self-hosted alternative to Cursor Agents. Control plane, agent loop, and model routing run entirely on your infrastructure." image: "/_next/static/media/OpenGraph.37da9236.jpg" canonical: "https://coder.com/solutions/agents/compare-cursor" --- ![](https://coder.com/_next/static/media/rotating-onboarding-bg.89573b56.jpg?w=3840) ![Cursor logo](https://coder.com/_next/static/media/cursor.e112be7e.svg?w=3840) vs # Compare Coder Agents to Cursor Agents Cursor's Self-Hosted Cloud Agents let teams run execution environments on infrastructure they control while relying on Cursor's cloud for orchestration, model access, and the overall agent experience. For many teams, that balance offers a practical way to adopt agent workflows without managing the full system themselves. [Coder Agents](https://coder.com/solutions/agents) is built for environments with stricter requirements. It keeps the control plane, agent loop, and model routing on infrastructure you control, giving teams full visibility into how agents run, how data flows, and whether anything operates outside their network perimeter. This makes it a better fit for regulated industries, air-gapped deployments, and organizations that need complete control over their development and AI systems. [Install Coder](https://coder.com/docs/install)[Read the deep dive](https://coder.com/blog/comparing-coder-agents-and-cursor-agents) ## Why look for Cursor Agents alternatives? - The agent loop runs in Cursor's cloud. Planning, state, and model inference stay in Cursor's control plane, and file chunks the model reads leave your network. That's a non-starter for strict perimeter or residency requirements. - LLM credentials and routing are Cursor-managed. Customers can't bring their own keys or route inference to self-hosted models or providers like Bedrock or Ollama. - Scaling is constrained by the system design. Cursor's worker pool has [documented limits](https://cursor.com/docs/cloud-agent/self-hosted-pool#how-it-works) of 50 workers per team and 10 per user, which can bottleneck high-volume parallel agent workloads. - Different design priorities. Cursor optimizes for a managed experience and fast onboarding; Coder is built for environments where infrastructure boundaries are non-negotiable. ## Architectural differences at a glance | Dimension | Coder Agents | Cursor Agents (self-hosted) | | --- | --- | --- | | Execution environment | Customer-controlled infrastructure | Customer-controlled infrastructure | | Agent loop location | Customer-controlled infrastructure | Cursor’s hosted cloud service | | Model inference | Direct to customer-configured provider, no Coder intermediary | Routed through Cursor | | Agent tool execution | Customer-controlled infrastructure | Customer-controlled infrastructure | | Code and prompt data path | Sent only to the configured provider, or kept fully in-network with self-hosted models | Code context is sent to Cursor for inference | | Internet dependency | Not required for fully self-contained deployments | Required for orchestration and inference | | Air-gap capable | Supported with self-hosted models | Not supported | | Model choice and control | Customer chooses and manages providers and models | Limited to Cursor-managed options | | Control plane location | Customer-controlled infrastructure | Cursor’s hosted cloud service | | Open source | [Yes](https://github.com/coder/coder) | No | ## Why teams choose Coder Agents When “self-hosted” means the entire stack: source code never leaves, model routing is under your control, and there’s no mandatory connectivity to a vendor’s cloud. ### Fully self-hosted architecture, not partial The entire system runs on your infrastructure, including the control plane, agent loop, model routing, and execution environments. There’s no dependency on an external service for orchestration. ### Air-gap and restricted-network ready Coder Agents can run without internet access using self-hosted models. This makes it viable for environments where outbound connectivity is limited or prohibited. ### Direct control over models and providers Teams choose which models to use and connect directly to providers like Anthropic, OpenAI, or self-hosted endpoints. There’s no intermediary managing routing or credentials. ### Built for enterprise scale Agent workflows run through centralized infrastructure that can support large developer populations without relying on fixed pools of workers or per-task environments. ### Unified infrastructure for devs and agents Agent environments use the same infrastructure and provisioning model as developer workspaces. Platform teams manage one system, not separate stacks. ### Open and inspectable The platform is fully open source, allowing teams to audit, extend, and integrate it into their existing systems without relying on a black box. ## Related content [![GitHub Codespaces logo](https://coder.com/_next/static/media/github.1a4ab8b7.png?w=3840) ### Compare Coder to Codespaces See more](https://coder.com/solutions/workspaces/compare#github-codespaces)[![Gitpod logo](https://coder.com/_next/static/media/gitpod.f4d82723.png?w=3840) ### Compare Coder to Gitpod See more](https://coder.com/solutions/workspaces/compare#gitpod)[![AWS CodeCatalyst logo](https://coder.com/_next/static/media/codecatalyst.464e2625.png?w=3840) ### Compare Coder to CodeCatalyst See more](https://coder.com/solutions/workspaces/compare#aws-codecatalyst) ## FAQs Is Coder Agents just another coding agent? No. Coder Agents is a system for running and orchestrating agent workflows on infrastructure you control. The native agent is part of that system, but the real value is in how agents run, how work is provisioned, and how behavior is managed across environments. Do I have to stop using tools like Cursor or Claude Code? What does "fully self-hosted" actually mean? Does any code or data leave my environment? How does this compare to Cursor's self-hosted agents? Is Coder Agents only for regulated industries? Is it harder to set up than a SaaS agent?