Coder powers secure, scalable development across key industries — automotive, finance, government, and technology — enabling faster builds, tighter compliance, and seamless AI adoption in enterprise-grade cloud environments.
Welcome to the guide for contributing to the Coder frontend. Whether you’re part
of the community or a Coder team member, this documentation will help you get
started.
If you have any questions, feel free to reach out on our
Discord server, and we’ll be happy to assist
you.
Running the UI
You can run the UI and access the Coder dashboard in two ways:
Build the UI pointing to an external Coder server:
CODER_HOST=https://mycoder.com pnpm dev inside of the site folder. This
is helpful when you are building something in the UI and already have the
data on your deployed server.
Build the entire Coder server + UI locally: ./scripts/develop.sh in the
root folder. This is useful for contributing to features that are not
deployed yet or that involve both the frontend and backend.
In both cases, you can access the dashboard on http://localhost:8080. If using
./scripts/develop.sh you can log in with the default credentials.
Authenticated routes - Place routes requiring authentication inside the
<RequireAuth> route. The RequireAuth component handles all the
authentication logic for the routes.
Dashboard routes - routes that live in the dashboard should be placed under
the <DashboardLayout> route. The DashboardLayout adds a navbar and passes
down common dashboard data.
Pages
Page components are the top-level components of the app and reside in the
src/pages folder. Each page should have its own folder to group relevant
views, tests, and utility functions. The page component fetches necessary data
and passes to the view. We explain this decision a bit better in the next
section which talks about where to fetch data.
ℹ️ If code within a page becomes reusable across other parts of the app,
consider moving it to src/utils, hooks, components, or modules.
Handling States
A page typically has three states: loading, ready/success, and
error. Ensure you manage these states when developing pages. Use visual
tests for these states with *.stories.ts files.
Data Fetching
We use TanStack Query v4
to fetch data from the API. Queries and mutation should be placed in the
api/queries folder.
Where to fetch data
In the past, our approach involved creating separate components for page and
view, where the page component served as a container responsible for fetching
data and passing it down to the view.
For instance, when developing a page to display users, we would have a
UsersPage component with a corresponding UsersPageView. The UsersPage
would handle API calls, while the UsersPageView managed the presentational
logic.
Over time, however, we encountered challenges with this approach, particularly
in terms of excessive props drilling. To address this, we opted to fetch data in
proximity to its usage. Taking the example of displaying users, in the past, if
we were creating a header component for that page, we would have needed to fetch
the data in the page component and pass it down through the hierarchy
(UsersPage -> UsersPageView -> UsersHeader). Now, with libraries such as
react-query, data fetching can be performed directly in the UsersHeader
component, allowing UI elements to declare and consume their data-fetching
dependencies directly, while preventing duplicate server requests
(more info).
To simplify visual testing of scenarios where components are responsible for
fetching data, you can easily set the queries' value using parameters.queries
within the component's story.
Our project uses axios as the HTTP client for
making API requests. The API functions are centralized in site/src/api/api.ts.
Auto-generated TypeScript types derived from our Go server are located in
site/src/api/typesGenerated.ts.
Typically, each API endpoint corresponds to its own Request and Response
types. However, some endpoints require additional parameters for successful
execution. Here's an illustrative example:"
Components should be atomic, reusable and free of business logic. Modules are
similar to components except that they can be more complex and can contain
business logic specific to the product.
MUI
The codebase is currently using MUI v5. Please see the
official documentation. In
general, favor building a custom component via MUI instead of plain React/HTML,
as MUI's suite of components is thoroughly battle-tested and accessible right
out of the box.
Structure
Each component and module gets its own folder. Module folders may group multiple
files in a hierarchical structure. Storybook stories and component tests using
Storybook interactions are required. By keeping these tidy, the codebase will
remain easy to navigate, healthy and maintainable for all contributors.
Accessibility
We strive to keep our UI accessible.
In general, colors should come from the app theme, but if there is a need to add
a custom color, please ensure that the foreground and background have a minimum
contrast ratio of 4.5:1 to meet WCAG level AA compliance. WebAIM has
a great tool for checking your colors directly,
but tools like
Dequeue's axe DevTools
can also do automated checks in certain situations.
When using any kind of input element, always make sure that there is a label
associated with that element (the label can be made invisible for aesthetic
reasons, but it should always be in the HTML markup). Labels are important for
screen-readers; a placeholder text value is not enough for all users.
When possible, make sure that all image/graphic elements have accompanying text
that describes the image. <img /> elements should have an alt text value. In
other situations, it might make sense to place invisible, descriptive text
inside the component itself using MUI's visuallyHidden utility function.
We use Formik for forms along with
Yup for schema definition and validation.
Testing
We use three types of testing in our app: End-to-end (E2E), Integration
and Visual Testing.
End-to-End (E2E)
These are useful for testing complete flows like "Create a user", "Import
template", etc. We use Playwright. If you only need
to test if the page is being rendered correctly, you should consider using the
Visual Testing approach.
ℹ️ For scenarios where you need to be authenticated, you can use
test.use({ storageState: getStatePath("authState") }).
For ease of debugging, it's possible to run a Playwright test in headful mode
running a Playwright server on your local machine, and executing the test inside
your workspace.
You can either run scripts/remote_playwright.sh from coder/coder on your
local machine, or execute the following command if you don't have the repo
available:
The scripts/remote_playwright.sh script will start a Playwright server on your
local machine and forward the necessary ports to your workspace. At the end of
the script, you will land inside your workspace with environment variables set
so you can simply execute the test (pnpm run playwright:test).
Integration
Test user interactions like "Click in a button shows a dialog", "Submit the form
sends the correct data", etc. For this, we use Jest and
react-testing-library.
If the test involves routing checks like redirects or maybe checking the info on
another page, you should probably consider using the E2E approach.
Visual testing
We use visual tests to test components without user interaction like testing if
a page/component is rendered correctly depending on some parameters, if a button
is showing a spinner, if loading props are passed correctly, etc. This should
always be your first option since it is way easier to maintain. For this, we use
Storybook and
Chromatic.
ℹ️ To learn more about testing components that fetch API data, refer to the
Where to fetch data section.
What should I test?
Choosing what to test is not always easy since there are a lot of flows and a
lot of things can happen but these are a few indicators that can help you with
that:
Things that can block the user
Reported bugs
Regression issues
Tests getting too slow
You may have observed that certain tests in our suite can be notably
time-consuming. Sometimes it is because the test itself is complex and sometimes
it is because of how the test is querying elements.
Using ByRole queries
One thing we figured out that was slowing down our tests was the use of ByRole
queries because of how it calculates the role attribute for every element on the
screen. You can read more about it on the links below:
Even with ByRole having performance issues we still want to use it but for
that, we have to scope the "querying" area by using the within command. So
instead of using screen.getByRole("button") directly we could do
within(form).getByRole("button").
❌ Not ideal. If the screen has a hundred or thousand elements it can be VERY
slow.
user.click(screen.getByRole("button"));
✅ Better. We can limit the number of elements we are querying.
const form = screen.getByTestId("form");
user.click(within(form).getByRole("button"));